
One brand I know a lot of our thong guys love is N2N Bodywear. They just released Dreamy thong in two really fun colors, ,Olive and Salmon. The sexy thong is super fun with these colors. Why go boring when you can go bold.






One brand I know a lot of our thong guys love is N2N Bodywear. They just released Dreamy thong in two really fun colors, ,Olive and Salmon. The sexy thong is super fun with these colors. Why go boring when you can go bold.






I have floated the idea for trying out the most famous white briefs. That includes Haynes, FOTL, Stafford, ,and Jockey. The only downside is that you can have to buy them in packs of six! What ever happened to the three packs? I’m calling on you guys, especially white brief guys, who want a full podcast of me talking about my experience in white briefs to shop my amazon wish list. I don’t do this much but this is something I think would benefit the entire podcast population.
You can shop my wish list here: UNB Tim’s White Brief Wish List.
I’m actually kinda excited to try them again. Wear Tighties has been amazing and I really enjoy them.
Also, what you will hear on the podcast:
I want to do more of these types of shows along with reviews. But I need your help to make this possible, Join the Patreon so we can buy underwear and give you our honest opinions of pairs. This will be the start of this journey.

MODUS VIVENDI unveils the Rainbow Hearts Line, one of the boldest and most seductive statements of the Spring-Summer 2026 season, accompanied by the provocative new campaign, “The Gentlemen’s Club.” A celebration of unapologetic confidence, sensual freedom, and magnetic masculinity, the campaign transports viewers into a world where temptation reigns and desire becomes performance.
After midnight, The Gentlemen’s Club awakens. Neon lights reflect on sweat-soaked skin, silhouettes move through shadows, and every glance feels charged with possibility. The atmosphere is electric — intimate yet fearless — a space where confidence is currency and seduction is instinctive. In this world, bodies become expressions of power, freedom, and attraction. The campaign captures the intoxicating energy of nights that dissolve into dawn, where playful exhibitionism meets raw sexuality, and men embrace the thrill of being seen.
With cinematic visuals and an atmosphere dripping in sensual tension, The Gentlemen’s Club embodies the spirit of the Rainbow Hearts Line: daring, expressive, flirtatious, and impossible to ignore. It celebrates men who own their identity without hesitation, who move with confidence, and who understand the irresistible power of authenticity.
At the center of the campaign is the Rainbow Hearts Line, a playful yet fashion-forward collection designed for modern men who want to stand out while remaining effortlessly stylish. Crafted from printed, soft, elasticated velvet-feel fabric, each piece combines luxurious comfort with bold visual impact. Lightweight and sensual against the skin, the fabric enhances the body while offering freedom of movement and a sleek, body-conscious fit.
The collection is distinguished by MODUS VIVENDI’s signature “Heart and Body” symbol, a striking emblem representing the union of love and desire. Presented in a vibrant multicolor palette inspired by the full spectrum of rainbow hues, the line radiates positivity, inclusivity, and fearless self-expression.
The Rainbow Hearts Line includes a complete selection of men’s underwear essentials and statement pieces. The range features daring jockstraps, low-cut briefs, classic briefs, and comfortable boxers, each designed to accentuate the masculine silhouette with confidence and sensuality. Beyond underwear, the collection expands into coordinated fashion pieces including tank tops, muscle-fit shirts, and fitted onesies, allowing for complete looks that transition seamlessly from intimate moments to bold nightlife-inspired styling.
Balancing provocative aesthetics with contemporary design, the Rainbow Hearts Line reflects MODUS VIVENDI’s ongoing commitment to combining fashion innovation with expressive sexuality. The collection invites men to embrace individuality, celebrate attraction, and wear their confidence openly.
With the launch of The Gentlemen’s Club campaign, MODUS VIVENDI once again pushes the boundaries of men’s fashion storytelling, creating a universe where style, seduction, and freedom collide under neon lights and endless nights.
































Discover Campaign: https://e-modusvivendi.com/rainbow-hearts-line/?utm_source=press_release&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=rainbow_hearts_line
Discover and follow MODUS VIVENDI on the following social media
Instagram: @_modus_vivendi_
YouTube: @_modus_vivendi_
Threads: @_modus_vivendi_
TikTok: @_modus_vivendi_
Facebook: Modus.Vivendi.Underwear

2024 vs. 2025 | Written in the UNB Tim voice
This report compares the shared survey columns from the 2024 and 2025 UNB Reader Surveys. I excluded Timestamp and the final email/PII field. That leaves 74 exact-match columns for a clean year-over-year read, plus columns that changed wording or structure and are called out separately.
For standard multiple-choice columns, I report the top answers with counts and percentages based on the full respondent count for that year. For list-style or comma-separated answers, I split the individual items and count each one separately. For truly open-ended questions, I report response volume and the most repeated keywords so we get a grounded read without forcing messy text into fake precision.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **35 – 44** stayed on top, moving from 29.6% in 2024 to 33.5% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | 35 – 44 | 61 | 29.6% | 35 – 44 | 54 | 33.5% |
| 2 | 25 – 34 | 49 | 23.8% | 25 – 34 | 39 | 24.2% |
| 3 | 45 – 54 | 49 | 23.8% | 45 – 54 | 34 | 21.1% |
| 4 | 55 – 65 | 27 | 13.1% | 55 – 65 | 21 | 13.0% |
| 5 | 65+ | 16 | 7.8% | 65+ | 9 | 5.6% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Male** stayed on top, moving from 99.0% in 2024 to 98.1% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Male | 204 | 99.0% | Male | 158 | 98.1% |
| 2 | NB | 1 | 0.5% | Non-Binary | 2 | 1.2% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Gay** stayed on top, moving from 43.2% in 2024 to 48.4% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Gay | 89 | 43.2% | Gay | 78 | 48.4% |
| 2 | Straight | 66 | 32.0% | Straight | 49 | 30.4% |
| 3 | Bisexual | 42 | 20.4% | Bisexual | 23 | 14.3% |
| 4 | Prefer not to answer | 4 | 1.9% | Don’t identify with labels | 4 | 2.5% |
| 5 | Don’t identify with labels | 4 | 1.9% | Pansexual | 2 | 1.2% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Married** stayed on top, moving from 50.0% in 2024 to 49.7% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Married | 103 | 50.0% | Married | 80 | 49.7% |
| 2 | Single | 64 | 31.1% | Single | 50 | 31.1% |
| 3 | Significant Other | 35 | 17.0% | Significant Other | 26 | 16.1% |
| 4 | Divorced | 3 | 1.5% | Divorced | 3 | 1.9% |
| 5 | Widowed | 1 | 0.5% | widower | 1 | 0.6% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **M** stayed on top, moving from 37.9% in 2024 to 39.8% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | M | 78 | 37.9% | M | 64 | 39.8% |
| 2 | L | 68 | 33.0% | L | 55 | 34.2% |
| 3 | XL | 25 | 12.1% | XL | 19 | 11.8% |
| 4 | S | 22 | 10.7% | S | 17 | 10.6% |
| 5 | XXL | 8 | 3.9% | XXL | 3 | 1.9% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **United States** stayed on top, moving from 62.6% in 2024 to 60.9% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | United States | 129 | 62.6% | United States | 98 | 60.9% |
| 2 | Europe | 17 | 8.3% | Europe | 21 | 13.0% |
| 3 | Canada | 17 | 8.3% | United Kingdom | 14 | 8.7% |
| 4 | United Kingdom | 15 | 7.3% | Australia | 11 | 6.8% |
| 5 | Australia | 13 | 6.3% | Canada | 11 | 6.8% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **41-70** at 21.8%, while in 2025 **21-40** moved into first at 26.7%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | 41-70 | 45 | 21.8% | 21-40 | 43 | 26.7% |
| 2 | 21-40 | 40 | 19.4% | 151+ | 37 | 23.0% |
| 3 | 151+ | 40 | 19.4% | 41-70 | 36 | 22.4% |
| 4 | 71-100 | 36 | 17.5% | 71-100 | 16 | 9.9% |
| 5 | 101-150 | 17 | 8.3% | 101-150 | 16 | 9.9% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Every few months** stayed on top, moving from 51.0% in 2024 to 66.5% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Every few months | 105 | 51.0% | Every few months | 107 | 66.5% |
| 2 | Monthly | 50 | 24.3% | Monthly | 33 | 20.5% |
| 3 | 2x a month | 23 | 11.2% | 2x a month | 13 | 8.1% |
| 4 | Weekly | 8 | 3.9% | Weekly | 7 | 4.3% |
| 5 | Daily | 2 | 1.0% | | % |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **A Mix of both** stayed on top, moving from 65.0% in 2024 to 73.9% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | A Mix of both | 134 | 65.0% | A Mix of both | 119 | 73.9% |
| 2 | On Sale | 49 | 23.8% | On Sale | 33 | 20.5% |
| 3 | Regular Price | 5 | 2.4% | Regular Price | 8 | 5.0% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **$15 – 20** at 28.6%, while in 2025 **$25+** moved into first at 30.4%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | $15 – 20 | 59 | 28.6% | $25+ | 49 | 30.4% |
| 2 | $20 – 25 | 51 | 24.8% | $20 – 25 | 48 | 29.8% |
| 3 | $25+ | 38 | 18.4% | $15 – 20 | 34 | 21.1% |
| 4 | $10 – 15 | 31 | 15.0% | $10 – 15 | 23 | 14.3% |
| 5 | $5-10 | 10 | 4.9% | $5-10 | 7 | 4.3% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **style** showed up 13 times in 2024 and 10 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Style | 13 | 8.8% | style | 10 | 8.5% |
| 2 | Brand | 5 | 3.4% | Design | 3 | 2.5% |
| 3 | fabric | 5 | 3.4% | fabric | 3 | 2.5% |
| 4 | material | 5 | 3.4% | color | 2 | 1.7% |
| 5 | quality | 4 | 2.7% | Cut | 2 | 1.7% |
| 6 | Color | 3 | 2.0% | How sexy it looks | 2 | 1.7% |
| 7 | comfort | 3 | 2.0% | new design | 2 | 1.7% |
| 8 | cut | 3 | 2.0% | A brand I like & find fits me well | 1 | 0.8% |
Response base: 148 nonblank responses in 2024 and 118 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Thong** stayed on top, moving from 38.3% in 2024 to 45.3% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Thong | 79 | 38.3% | Thong | 73 | 45.3% |
| 2 | Brief | 47 | 22.8% | Bikini | 35 | 21.7% |
| 3 | Bikini | 38 | 18.4% | Brief | 31 | 19.3% |
| 4 | Jock | 11 | 5.3% | Jock | 14 | 8.7% |
| 5 | Boxer Brief | 8 | 3.9% | Boxer Brief | 6 | 3.7% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Solid colors** showed up 195 times in 2024 and 156 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Solid colors | 195 | 94.7% | Solid colors | 156 | 96.9% |
| 2 | Prints | 90 | 43.7% | Prints | 61 | 37.9% |
| 3 | Stripes | 60 | 29.1% | Stripes | 48 | 29.8% |
Response base: 206 nonblank responses in 2024 and 161 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Throw away** showed up 132 times in 2024 and 103 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Throw away | 132 | 64.7% | Throw away | 103 | 64.4% |
| 2 | Put into storage | 58 | 28.4% | Put into storage | 54 | 33.8% |
| 3 | Give to a friend | 17 | 8.3% | Give to a friend | 15 | 9.4% |
| 4 | Sell online (Poshmark etc) | 12 | 5.9% | Sell online (Poshmark etc) | 12 | 7.5% |
| 5 | Donate | 2 | 1.0% | Donate | 2 | 1.2% |
| 6 | fabric recycling | 2 | 1.0% | cut up as dusters | 1 | 0.6% |
| 7 | and I’ve found because of holes and wear I don’t even pull them out anymore (and need the space lol) | 1 | 0.5% | cut up before disposal | 1 | 0.6% |
| 8 | Back of my drawer. Need to clean out to make room for more pairs!! | 1 | 0.5% | cut up first | 1 | 0.6% |
Response base: 204 nonblank responses in 2024 and 160 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Sizing Issues** showed up 115 times in 2024 and 83 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Sizing Issues | 115 | 56.9% | Sizing Issues | 83 | 53.2% |
| 2 | Pouch – Too Small | 76 | 37.6% | Pouch – Too Small | 62 | 39.7% |
| 3 | Labels or tags | 74 | 36.6% | Labels or tags | 56 | 35.9% |
| 4 | Pricing | 61 | 30.2% | Construction Issues | 50 | 32.1% |
| 5 | Store Selection | 61 | 30.2% | Societal Issues | 39 | 25.0% |
| 6 | Societal Issues | 58 | 28.7% | Store Selection | 39 | 25.0% |
| 7 | Construction Issues | 52 | 25.7% | Comfort | 37 | 23.7% |
| 8 | Ridding UP | 44 | 21.8% | Support | 37 | 23.7% |
Response base: 202 nonblank responses in 2024 and 156 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Blue** showed up 158 times in 2024 and 127 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Blue | 158 | 77.8% | Blue | 127 | 80.4% |
| 2 | Black | 122 | 60.1% | Black | 100 | 63.3% |
| 3 | Red | 115 | 56.7% | Red | 81 | 51.3% |
| 4 | Green | 84 | 41.4% | Purple | 63 | 39.9% |
| 5 | White | 80 | 39.4% | Green | 57 | 36.1% |
| 6 | Purple | 79 | 38.9% | White | 53 | 33.5% |
| 7 | Orange | 71 | 35.0% | Pink | 50 | 31.6% |
| 8 | Pink | 70 | 34.5% | Orange | 41 | 25.9% |
Response base: 203 nonblank responses in 2024 and 158 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Calvin Klein** led the answers, while in 2025 **Cocksox** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Calvin Klein | 27 | 15.3% | Cocksox | 16 | 11.3% |
| 2 | Aussiebum | 25 | 14.1% | N2N | 15 | 10.6% |
| 3 | Andrew Christian | 22 | 12.4% | Ergowear | 13 | 9.2% |
| 4 | 2xist | 19 | 10.7% | Aussiebum | 12 | 8.5% |
| 5 | Cocksox | 19 | 10.7% | Calvin Klein | 12 | 8.5% |
| 6 | Gregg Homme | 18 | 10.2% | Gregg Homme | 12 | 8.5% |
| 7 | Jockey | 18 | 10.2% | 2xist | 7 | 5.0% |
| 8 | N2N | 18 | 10.2% | Andrew Christian | 7 | 5.0% |
Response base: 177 nonblank responses in 2024 and 141 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Andrew Christian** showed up 10 times in 2024 and 15 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Andrew Christian | 10 | 8.4% | Andrew Christian | 15 | 14.7% |
| 2 | 2xist | 5 | 4.2% | Hanes | 9 | 8.8% |
| 3 | Aussiebum | 5 | 4.2% | 2xist | 5 | 4.9% |
| 4 | Hanes | 5 | 4.2% | Calvin Klein | 5 | 4.9% |
| 5 | Candyman | 4 | 3.4% | Fruit of the Loom | 4 | 3.9% |
| 6 | Jockey | 4 | 3.4% | jockey | 4 | 3.9% |
| 7 | Box | 3 | 2.5% | JJ Malibu | 3 | 2.9% |
| 8 | Fruit of the Loom | 3 | 2.5% | N2n | 3 | 2.9% |
Response base: 119 nonblank responses in 2024 and 102 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Yes** stayed on top, moving from 62.6% in 2024 to 63.4% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Yes | 129 | 62.6% | Yes | 102 | 63.4% |
| 2 | No | 74 | 35.9% | No | 53 | 32.9% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Review** showed up 101 times in 2024 and 77 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Review | 101 | 63.1% | Review | 77 | 55.8% |
| 2 | Social Media Post | 48 | 30.0% | Social Media Post | 49 | 35.5% |
| 3 | Brief Distraction | 46 | 28.7% | Brief Distraction | 45 | 32.6% |
| 4 | UNB Brief Talk Podcast | 46 | 28.7% | UNB Brief Talk Podcast | 42 | 30.4% |
| 5 | Interview with brand | 39 | 24.4% | Interview with brand | 27 | 19.6% |
| 6 | News Write up | 35 | 21.9% | Interview with Model | 23 | 16.7% |
| 7 | UNB Swimwear Guide | 21 | 13.1% | News Write up | 21 | 15.2% |
| 8 | UNB Reader Awards | 18 | 11.2% | UNB Swimwear Guide | 15 | 10.9% |
Response base: 160 nonblank responses in 2024 and 138 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 66 nonblank responses in 2024 and 44 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **talk, styles, different, other** in 2024 and **reviews, based, interviews, show** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | talk | 5 | reviews | 5 |
| 2 | styles | 5 | based | 4 |
| 3 | different | 5 | interviews | 4 |
| 4 | other | 4 | show | 4 |
| 5 | thongs | 4 | styles | 4 |
| 6 | know | 4 | never | 3 |
| 7 | products | 3 | made | 3 |
| 8 | good | 3 | different | 3 |
| 9 | reviews | 3 | trying | 2 |
| 10 | hearing | 3 | seeing | 2 |
Response base: 66 nonblank responses in 2024 and 44 in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **International jock** showed up 27 times in 2024 and 14 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | International Jock | 27 | 20.9% | International jock | 14 | 15.2% |
| 2 | Amazon | 16 | 12.4% | N2N | 7 | 7.6% |
| 3 | N2N | 8 | 6.2% | Aussiebum | 5 | 5.4% |
| 4 | aussiebum | 7 | 5.4% | Amazon | 4 | 4.3% |
| 5 | Cheapundies | 7 | 5.4% | Andrew Christian | 4 | 4.3% |
| 6 | Calvin Klein | 4 | 3.1% | deadgoodundies | 4 | 4.3% |
| 7 | freshpair | 4 | 3.1% | Gregg Homme | 4 | 4.3% |
| 8 | Hisroom | 4 | 3.1% | hisroom | 4 | 4.3% |
Response base: 129 nonblank responses in 2024 and 92 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **30%+** led the answers, while in 2025 **20-25% off** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | 30%+ | 93 | 45.8% | 20-25% off | 68 | 43.0% |
| 2 | 20-25% off | 90 | 44.3% | 30%+ | 64 | 40.5% |
| 3 | 25-30% off | 71 | 35.0% | 25-30% off | 40 | 25.3% |
| 4 | 15-20% off | 40 | 19.7% | 15-20% off | 39 | 24.7% |
| 5 | 10-15% off | 7 | 3.4% | 10-15% off | 7 | 4.4% |
| 6 | 5-10% off | 2 | 1.0% | 5-10% off | 2 | 1.3% |
Response base: 203 nonblank responses in 2024 and 158 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Gregg Homme** showed up 9 times in 2024 and 9 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Gregg Homme | 9 | 7.2% | Gregg Homme | 9 | 9.9% |
| 2 | N2N | 9 | 7.2% | N2N | 6 | 6.6% |
| 3 | 2xist | 7 | 5.6% | Ergowear | 5 | 5.5% |
| 4 | Calvin Klein | 7 | 5.6% | Cocksox | 4 | 4.4% |
| 5 | Olaf Benz | 6 | 4.8% | Manstore | 3 | 3.3% |
| 6 | Addicted | 5 | 4.0% | modus vivendi | 3 | 3.3% |
| 7 | Ergowear | 5 | 4.0% | Muscleskins | 3 | 3.3% |
| 8 | Manstore | 5 | 4.0% | Olaf Benz | 3 | 3.3% |
Response base: 125 nonblank responses in 2024 and 91 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Swim Briefs** showed up 122 times in 2024 and 96 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Swim Briefs | 122 | 64.2% | Swim Briefs | 96 | 62.7% |
| 2 | Swim trunks | 83 | 43.7% | Swim trunks | 61 | 39.9% |
| 3 | Trunks | 83 | 43.7% | Trunks | 61 | 39.9% |
| 4 | Swim Shorts | 72 | 37.9% | Swim Shorts | 54 | 35.3% |
| 5 | Thongs | 49 | 25.8% | Thongs | 50 | 32.7% |
| 6 | Board Shorts | 35 | 18.4% | Board Shorts | 25 | 16.3% |
| 7 | G-strings | 1 | 0.5% | g string | 1 | 0.7% |
| 8 | String bikini briefs | 1 | 0.5% | Small bikinis | 1 | 0.7% |
Response base: 190 nonblank responses in 2024 and 153 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **But I want to wear one** led the answers, while in 2025 **Yes** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | But I want to wear one | 77 | 39.7% | Yes | 67 | 43.5% |
| 2 | Yes | 62 | 32.0% | But I want to wear one | 57 | 37.0% |
| 3 | I do not have an interest in wearing | 55 | 28.4% | I do not have an interest in wearing | 30 | 19.5% |
Response base: 194 nonblank responses in 2024 and 154 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Swim Briefs** showed up 113 times in 2024 and 93 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Swim Briefs | 113 | 64.2% | Swim Briefs | 93 | 62.4% |
| 2 | Thongs | 67 | 38.1% | Thongs | 56 | 37.6% |
| 3 | Swim trunks | 55 | 31.2% | Swim Shorts | 34 | 22.8% |
| 4 | Trunks | 55 | 31.2% | Swim trunks | 30 | 20.1% |
| 5 | Swim Shorts | 43 | 24.4% | Trunks | 30 | 20.1% |
| 6 | Board Shorts | 20 | 11.4% | Board Shorts | 12 | 8.1% |
| 7 | As of now none | 1 | 0.6% | and seldom get to a beach unfortunately | 1 | 0.7% |
| 8 | As opposed to switching styles I’m slowly lowering the inseam measurement. | 1 | 0.6% | Bikini | 1 | 0.7% |
Response base: 176 nonblank responses in 2024 and 149 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Blue** showed up 149 times in 2024 and 120 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Blue | 149 | 81.0% | Blue | 120 | 78.9% |
| 2 | Black | 105 | 57.1% | Black | 84 | 55.3% |
| 3 | Red | 87 | 47.3% | Red | 59 | 38.8% |
| 4 | Green | 72 | 39.1% | Green | 54 | 35.5% |
| 5 | Orange | 56 | 30.4% | Purple | 44 | 28.9% |
| 6 | Pink | 51 | 27.7% | White | 35 | 23.0% |
| 7 | Purple | 50 | 27.2% | Pink | 32 | 21.1% |
| 8 | White | 50 | 27.2% | Yellow | 28 | 18.4% |
Response base: 184 nonblank responses in 2024 and 152 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **2-3** at 42.2%, while in 2025 **1** moved into first at 40.4%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | 2-3 | 87 | 42.2% | 1 | 65 | 40.4% |
| 2 | 1 | 61 | 29.6% | 2-3 | 58 | 36.0% |
| 3 | 4-6 | 24 | 11.7% | 4-6 | 16 | 9.9% |
| 4 | 11+ | 9 | 4.4% | 7-10 | 8 | 5.0% |
| 5 | 7-10 | 8 | 3.9% | 11+ | 8 | 5.0% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **$36-50** stayed on top, moving from 36.4% in 2024 to 32.9% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | $36-50 | 75 | 36.4% | $36-50 | 53 | 32.9% |
| 2 | $20-35 | 62 | 30.1% | $20-35 | 52 | 32.3% |
| 3 | $51-65 | 29 | 14.1% | $51-65 | 21 | 13.0% |
| 4 | $66-80 | 12 | 5.8% | $66-80 | 15 | 9.3% |
| 5 | Under $20 | 12 | 5.8% | $80+ | 10 | 6.2% |
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 198 nonblank responses in 2024 and 159 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **swim, shorts, brief, trunks** in 2024 and **swim, shorts, brief, trunks** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | swim | 175 | swim | 152 |
| 2 | shorts | 146 | shorts | 97 |
| 3 | brief | 75 | brief | 73 |
| 4 | trunks | 56 | trunks | 41 |
| 5 | square | 56 | square | 41 |
| 6 | cuts | 56 | cuts | 41 |
| 7 | board | 50 | board | 26 |
| 8 | thong | 4 | thong | 8 |
Response base: 198 nonblank responses in 2024 and 159 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 194 nonblank responses in 2024 and 157 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **swim, shorts, brief, board** in 2024 and **swim, shorts, brief, trunks** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | swim | 186 | swim | 160 |
| 2 | shorts | 146 | shorts | 93 |
| 3 | brief | 75 | brief | 74 |
| 4 | board | 49 | trunks | 36 |
| 5 | trunks | 48 | square | 36 |
| 6 | square | 48 | cuts | 36 |
| 7 | cuts | 48 | board | 25 |
| 8 | thong | 14 | thong | 18 |
Response base: 194 nonblank responses in 2024 and 157 in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Swim Shorts** led the answers, while in 2025 **Swim Brief** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Swim Shorts | 90 | 45.7% | Swim Brief | 86 | 54.1% |
| 2 | Swim Brief | 83 | 42.1% | Swim Shorts | 66 | 41.5% |
| 3 | Square cuts | 51 | 25.9% | Square cuts | 41 | 25.8% |
| 4 | Trunks | 51 | 25.9% | Trunks | 41 | 25.8% |
| 5 | Board Shorts | 50 | 25.4% | Swim thong | 29 | 18.2% |
| 6 | Swim thong | 26 | 13.2% | Board Shorts | 27 | 17.0% |
Response base: 197 nonblank responses in 2024 and 159 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Swim Brief** showed up 113 times in 2024 and 94 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Swim Brief | 113 | 57.7% | Swim Brief | 94 | 59.9% |
| 2 | Swim thong | 62 | 31.6% | Swim thong | 61 | 38.9% |
| 3 | Swim Shorts | 54 | 27.6% | Square cuts | 39 | 24.8% |
| 4 | Square cuts | 50 | 25.5% | Trunks | 39 | 24.8% |
| 5 | Trunks | 50 | 25.5% | Swim Shorts | 36 | 22.9% |
| 6 | Board Shorts | 28 | 14.3% | Board Shorts | 16 | 10.2% |
Response base: 196 nonblank responses in 2024 and 157 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Swim Brief** showed up 118 times in 2024 and 96 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Swim Brief | 118 | 59.9% | Swim Brief | 96 | 61.1% |
| 2 | Swim thong | 100 | 50.8% | Swim thong | 95 | 60.5% |
| 3 | Square cuts | 36 | 18.3% | Square cuts | 25 | 15.9% |
| 4 | Trunks | 36 | 18.3% | Trunks | 25 | 15.9% |
| 5 | Swim Shorts | 35 | 17.8% | Swim Shorts | 23 | 14.6% |
| 6 | Board Shorts | 19 | 9.6% | Board Shorts | 8 | 5.1% |
Response base: 197 nonblank responses in 2024 and 157 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 195 nonblank responses in 2024 and 156 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **swim, thong, brief, shorts** in 2024 and **swim, thong, brief, shorts** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | swim | 236 | swim | 200 |
| 2 | thong | 113 | thong | 99 |
| 3 | brief | 101 | brief | 85 |
| 4 | shorts | 34 | shorts | 21 |
| 5 | trunks | 23 | trunks | 16 |
| 6 | square | 23 | square | 16 |
| 7 | cuts | 23 | cuts | 16 |
| 8 | board | 12 | board | 5 |
Response base: 195 nonblank responses in 2024 and 156 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 175 nonblank responses in 2024 and 134 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **swim, thong, brief, shorts** in 2024 and **swim, thong, brief, shorts** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | swim | 201 | swim | 147 |
| 2 | thong | 118 | thong | 88 |
| 3 | brief | 73 | brief | 52 |
| 4 | shorts | 17 | shorts | 9 |
| 5 | trunks | 10 | trunks | 7 |
| 6 | square | 10 | square | 7 |
| 7 | cuts | 10 | cuts | 7 |
| 8 | board | 7 | board | 2 |
Response base: 175 nonblank responses in 2024 and 134 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 181 nonblank responses in 2024 and 133 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2024 and **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | shorts | 173 | shorts | 134 |
| 2 | spandex | 103 | spandex | 74 |
| 3 | pants | 75 | pants | 57 |
| 4 | runners | 64 | runners | 45 |
| 5 | tights | 64 | tights | 45 |
| 6 | track | 25 | track | 19 |
| 7 | sweat | 25 | sweat | 19 |
| 8 | yoga | 25 | yoga | 19 |
| 9 | singlets | 9 | singlets | 7 |
Response base: 181 nonblank responses in 2024 and 133 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 171 nonblank responses in 2024 and 131 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **shorts, pants, spandex, runners** in 2024 and **shorts, pants, spandex, runners** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | shorts | 164 | shorts | 126 |
| 2 | pants | 75 | pants | 63 |
| 3 | spandex | 66 | spandex | 60 |
| 4 | runners | 38 | runners | 37 |
| 5 | tights | 38 | tights | 37 |
| 6 | track | 25 | track | 21 |
| 7 | sweat | 25 | sweat | 21 |
| 8 | yoga | 25 | yoga | 21 |
| 9 | singlets | 12 | singlets | 16 |
Response base: 171 nonblank responses in 2024 and 131 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 182 nonblank responses in 2024 and 138 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2024 and **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | shorts | 184 | shorts | 135 |
| 2 | spandex | 85 | spandex | 74 |
| 3 | pants | 66 | pants | 54 |
| 4 | runners | 43 | runners | 45 |
| 5 | tights | 43 | tights | 45 |
| 6 | track | 22 | track | 18 |
| 7 | sweat | 22 | sweat | 18 |
| 8 | yoga | 22 | yoga | 18 |
| 9 | singlets | 10 | singlets | 10 |
Response base: 182 nonblank responses in 2024 and 138 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 163 nonblank responses in 2024 and 114 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2024 and **shorts, spandex, pants, runners** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | shorts | 163 | shorts | 104 |
| 2 | spandex | 65 | spandex | 47 |
| 3 | pants | 57 | pants | 45 |
| 4 | runners | 33 | runners | 30 |
| 5 | tights | 33 | tights | 30 |
| 6 | track | 19 | track | 15 |
| 7 | sweat | 19 | sweat | 15 |
| 8 | yoga | 19 | yoga | 15 |
| 9 | singlets | 9 | singlets | 8 |
Response base: 163 nonblank responses in 2024 and 114 in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 153 nonblank responses in 2024 and 116 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **shorts, pants, spandex, runners** in 2024 and **shorts, pants, spandex, runners** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | shorts | 135 | shorts | 95 |
| 2 | pants | 105 | pants | 75 |
| 3 | spandex | 70 | spandex | 60 |
| 4 | runners | 42 | runners | 38 |
| 5 | tights | 42 | tights | 38 |
| 6 | track | 35 | track | 25 |
| 7 | sweat | 35 | sweat | 25 |
| 8 | singlets | 10 | singlets | 7 |
Response base: 153 nonblank responses in 2024 and 116 in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **No** stayed on top, moving from 47.1% in 2024 to 38.5% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 97 | 47.1% | No | 62 | 38.5% |
| 2 | Yes | 52 | 25.2% | I wear something over my spandex (shorts, etc) | 47 | 29.2% |
| 3 | I wear something over my spandex (shorts, etc) | 41 | 19.9% | Yes | 42 | 26.1% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **$21-35** at 31.6%, while in 2025 **$36-50** moved into first at 28.0%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | $21-35 | 65 | 31.6% | $36-50 | 45 | 28.0% |
| 2 | $36-50 | 60 | 29.1% | $21-35 | 40 | 24.8% |
| 3 | $51-70 | 32 | 15.5% | $51-70 | 33 | 20.5% |
| 4 | Under $20 | 15 | 7.3% | Under $20 | 14 | 8.7% |
| 5 | $71-90 | 9 | 4.4% | $71-90 | 9 | 5.6% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Nike** showed up 27 times in 2024 and 23 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Nike | 27 | 25.2% | Nike | 23 | 28.0% |
| 2 | Under Armour | 20 | 18.7% | Adidas | 11 | 13.4% |
| 3 | Adidas | 18 | 16.8% | Under Armour | 7 | 8.5% |
| 4 | Lululemon | 8 | 7.5% | N2N | 5 | 6.1% |
| 5 | Gymshark | 5 | 4.7% | Teamm8 | 5 | 6.1% |
| 6 | UA | 4 | 3.7% | UA | 5 | 6.1% |
| 7 | 2xu | 3 | 2.8% | Lululemon | 4 | 4.9% |
| 8 | Addidas | 3 | 2.8% | Matador | 3 | 3.7% |
Response base: 107 nonblank responses in 2024 and 82 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Spandex gear** showed up 54 times in 2024 and 45 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Spandex gear | 54 | 49.1% | Spandex gear | 45 | 43.3% |
| 2 | Lace | 48 | 43.6% | Lace | 36 | 34.6% |
| 3 | Bodysuits | 36 | 32.7% | Wrestling Singlets | 36 | 34.6% |
| 4 | Leather | 32 | 29.1% | Harness | 35 | 33.7% |
| 5 | Wrestling Singlets | 30 | 27.3% | Bodysuits | 33 | 31.7% |
| 6 | Harness | 28 | 25.5% | Leather | 31 | 29.8% |
| 7 | Latex | 8 | 7.3% | Latex | 10 | 9.6% |
| 8 | Rubber | 7 | 6.4% | Rubber | 7 | 6.7% |
Response base: 110 nonblank responses in 2024 and 104 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 125 nonblank responses in 2024 and 110 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **online, store, specialty, brick** in 2024 and **online, store, specialty, brick** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | online | 102 | online | 96 |
| 2 | store | 73 | store | 67 |
| 3 | specialty | 43 | specialty | 38 |
| 4 | brick | 13 | brick | 10 |
| 5 | mortar | 13 | mortar | 10 |
| 6 | thing | 1 | wrestling | 1 |
| 7 | need | 1 | supplier | 1 |
| 8 | another | 1 | amazon | 1 |
| 9 | selection | 1 | zentai | 1 |
| 10 | above | 1 | stores | 1 |
Response base: 125 nonblank responses in 2024 and 110 in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Yes** stayed on top, moving from 70.4% in 2024 to 80.1% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Yes | 145 | 70.4% | Yes | 129 | 80.1% |
| 2 | Maybe | 35 | 17.0% | Maybe | 28 | 17.4% |
| 3 | No | 15 | 7.3% | No | 4 | 2.5% |
| 4 | Real sizes, but not overweight or obese :/ | 1 | 0.5% | | % | |
| 5 | I say yes because we should all feel comfortable in our skin. At the same time I say no because we need to set examples of health. Real heathy guys. Not super fit that is unobtainable for most.but not obese either. This one is a difficult question | 1 | 0.5% | | % |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Brief Talk – Their favorite style and why they love it** showed up 147 times in 2024 and 114 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Brief Talk – Their favorite style and why they love it | 147 | 84.0% | Brief Talk – Their favorite style and why they love it | 114 | 78.1% |
| 2 | Brief Tales – How they fell in love with underwear | 135 | 77.1% | Brief Distractions – pictures | 108 | 74.0% |
| 3 | Brief Distractions – pictures | 127 | 72.6% | Brief Tales – How they fell in love with underwear | 105 | 71.9% |
| 4 | Interviews | 95 | 54.3% | Interviews | 70 | 47.9% |
| 5 | attending parties or clubs where everyone is in their briefs | 1 | 0.6% | it’s not good. It’s not sexy. That may not be progressive but I would hate for your site to die due to a few who want to share their own photos. No brand uses real guys. Because I think all of us want to be the hot model. That’s what makes underwear to appealing. Something I hope you consider as I know some will be vocal for real guys | 1 | 0.7% |
| 6 | If they feel comfortable and you’re cool with it all the above. | 1 | 0.6% | No. | 1 | 0.7% |
| 7 | I’d like to hear real guys telling fantasy or real stories about adventures in briefs | 1 | 0.6% | Not sure – yet to listen | 1 | 0.7% |
| 8 | More sexual content | 1 | 0.6% | Photos | 1 | 0.7% |
Response base: 175 nonblank responses in 2024 and 146 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 129 nonblank responses in 2024 and 93 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **weight, skinny, belly, enough** in 2024 and **weight, belly, size, stomach** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | weight | 24 | weight | 16 |
| 2 | skinny | 11 | belly | 8 |
| 3 | belly | 9 | size | 7 |
| 4 | enough | 7 | stomach | 6 |
| 5 | than | 7 | hair | 5 |
| 6 | muscle | 6 | overweight | 5 |
| 7 | look | 6 | muscle | 4 |
| 8 | small | 5 | shape | 4 |
| 9 | even | 5 | myself | 4 |
| 10 | work | 5 | muscular | 3 |
Response base: 129 nonblank responses in 2024 and 93 in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **A mix of all?** stayed on top, moving from 49.0% in 2024 to 49.7% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | A mix of all? | 101 | 49.0% | A mix of all? | 80 | 49.7% |
| 2 | Real Guys/Average Guys | 41 | 19.9% | Real Guys/Average Guys | 43 | 26.7% |
| 3 | Up and coming Models | 22 | 10.7% | Body Positive guys (guys of all sizes) | 13 | 8.1% |
| 4 | Professional Models | 20 | 9.7% | Up and coming Models | 12 | 7.5% |
| 5 | Body Positive guys (guys of all sizes) | 12 | 5.8% | Professional Models | 9 | 5.6% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **No** stayed on top, moving from 56.3% in 2024 to 52.8% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 116 | 56.3% | No | 85 | 52.8% |
| 2 | Yes | 79 | 38.3% | Yes | 69 | 42.9% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Yes** showed up 65 times in 2024 and 70 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Yes | 65 | 33.5% | Yes | 70 | 45.8% |
| 2 | an alt account | 51 | 26.3% | an alt account | 55 | 35.9% |
| 3 | my main account | 14 | 7.2% | my main account | 15 | 9.8% |
Response base: 194 nonblank responses in 2024 and 153 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Twitter** led the answers, while in 2025 **BlueSky** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | 53 | 65.4% | BlueSky | 43 | 61.4% | |
| 2 | 31 | 38.3% | 29 | 41.4% | ||
| 3 | 8 | 9.9% | 25 | 35.7% | ||
| 4 | 5 | 6.2% | 7 | 10.0% | ||
| 5 | BlueSky | 4 | 4.9% | Just For Fans | 5 | 7.1% |
| 6 | Just For Fans | 4 | 4.9% | Only Fans | 5 | 7.1% |
| 7 | Only Fans | 4 | 4.9% | Threads | 4 | 5.7% |
| 8 | Threads | 4 | 4.9% | tumblr | 4 | 5.7% |
Response base: 81 nonblank responses in 2024 and 70 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 25 nonblank responses in 2024 and 23 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **instagram, pinterest, facebook, tumblr** in 2024 and **instagram, twitter, facebook, threads** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | 13 | 15 | ||
| 2 | 5 | 3 | ||
| 3 | 4 | 3 | ||
| 4 | tumblr | 3 | threads | 2 |
| 5 | something | 3 | 2 | |
| 6 | youtube | 2 | tumblr | 1 |
| 7 | tiktok | 2 | youtube | 1 |
| 8 | don’t | 2 | ||
| 9 | because | 2 | ||
| 10 | didn’t | 2 |
Response base: 25 nonblank responses in 2024 and 23 in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **gear lovers (Community Building)** showed up 63 times in 2024 and 39 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | gear lovers (Community Building) | 63 | 57.8% | gear lovers (Community Building) | 39 | 50.0% |
| 2 | Unsure where to go to connect with other underwear | 63 | 57.8% | Unsure where to go to connect with other underwear | 39 | 50.0% |
| 3 | Unclear rules on what is a TOS violation | 32 | 29.4% | Having posts deleted for TOS violations | 29 | 37.2% |
| 4 | Having posts deleted for TOS violations | 26 | 23.9% | Unclear rules on what is a TOS violation | 29 | 37.2% |
| 5 | Loosing touch with online friends to account or social media site issues (Communication) | 16 | 14.7% | Accounts deleted | 12 | 15.4% |
| 6 | Accounts deleted | 12 | 11.0% | Loosing touch with online friends to account or social media site issues (Communication) | 11 | 14.1% |
| 7 | Career choices I don’t want to post things online that could potentially get back to me. | 1 | 0.9% | and have no desire to communicate with people other than relatives | 1 | 1.3% |
| 8 | I don’t share my own content on social | 1 | 0.9% | Avoid due to privacy concerns | 1 | 1.3% |
Response base: 109 nonblank responses in 2024 and 78 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **Yes** at 44.2%, while in 2025 **Maybe** moved into first at 39.8%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Yes | 91 | 44.2% | Maybe | 64 | 39.8% |
| 2 | Maybe | 74 | 35.9% | Yes | 64 | 39.8% |
| 3 | No | 29 | 14.1% | No | 22 | 13.7% |
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **Yes** stayed on top, moving from 71.8% in 2024 to 74.5% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | Yes | 148 | 71.8% | Yes | 120 | 74.5% |
| 2 | No | 42 | 20.4% | No | 25 | 15.5% |
| 3 | Maybe | 7 | 3.4% | Maybe | 9 | 5.6% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Instagram** showed up 122 times in 2024 and 90 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | 122 | 78.2% | 90 | 70.3% | ||
| 2 | 104 | 66.7% | 64 | 50.0% | ||
| 3 | 52 | 33.3% | BlueSky | 56 | 43.8% | |
| 4 | YouTube | 27 | 17.3% | 35 | 27.3% | |
| 5 | TikTok | 14 | 9.0% | YouTube | 20 | 15.6% |
| 6 | Threads | 10 | 6.4% | TikTok | 10 | 7.8% |
| 7 | 7 | 4.5% | Threads | 6 | 4.7% | |
| 8 | Mastadon | 4 | 2.6% | Mastadon | 3 | 2.3% |
Response base: 156 nonblank responses in 2024 and 128 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **are geared away from straight men.** led the answers, while in 2025 **Americans are too damn conservative.** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | are geared away from straight men. | 1 | 1.6% | Americans are too damn conservative. | 1 | 2.2% |
| 2 | bikinis | 1 | 1.6% | been left high and dry by a company that does no customer service outreach. | 1 | 2.2% |
| 3 | but it frustrates me that men get judge when showing theirs. I have curated my IG so I can learn more about brands and their fit. | 1 | 1.6% | Bluesky preferred | 1 | 2.2% |
| 4 | but I lost many great connections and friends when my account got deleted after a post. There was no disputing their decision. Just gone! I’m on twitter but its been work to rebuild connections. | 1 | 1.6% | but imagine only features within the gay community | 1 | 2.2% |
| 5 | classist | 1 | 1.6% | but it was actually fine | 1 | 2.2% |
| 6 | Communities to join are limited knowledge for me | 1 | 1.6% | but may be a bit too much whenever I am out and about in public | 1 | 2.2% |
| 7 | condescendant and mean to others. | 1 | 1.6% | but not on the level of women’s. | 1 | 2.2% |
| 8 | Didn’t know that was a thing. | 1 | 1.6% | but social networks trying to pretend it does not exist | 1 | 2.2% |
Response base: 61 nonblank responses in 2024 and 46 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **friends about underwear** led the answers, while in 2025 **Acceptance by Society** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | friends about underwear | 90 | 47.1% | Acceptance by Society | 67 | 44.1% |
| 2 | Not being able to talk freely to family | 90 | 47.1% | friends about underwear | 55 | 36.2% |
| 3 | Acceptance by Society | 79 | 41.4% | Not being able to talk freely to family | 55 | 36.2% |
| 4 | Being labeled as gay for liking underwear | 73 | 38.2% | Being labeled as gay for liking underwear | 50 | 32.9% |
| 5 | The price of underwear | 71 | 37.2% | The price of underwear | 45 | 29.6% |
| 6 | Having to sneak and buy your underwear | 48 | 25.1% | I have no challenges | 36 | 23.7% |
| 7 | Acceptance by Significant other (Wife | 45 | 23.6% | Acceptance by Significant other (Wife | 33 | 21.7% |
| 8 | BF or GF) | 45 | 23.6% | BF or GF) | 33 | 21.7% |
Response base: 191 nonblank responses in 2024 and 152 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Yes** showed up 98 times in 2024 and 82 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Yes | 98 | 50.0% | Yes | 82 | 53.9% |
| 2 | they aren’t into it as much as me | 54 | 27.6% | they aren’t into it as much as me | 46 | 30.3% |
| 3 | I don’t have a partner (single) | 45 | 23.0% | I don’t have a partner (single) | 39 | 25.7% |
| 4 | fully support me | 44 | 22.4% | fully support me | 36 | 23.7% |
| 5 | But they don’t stop me from my love | 34 | 17.3% | But they don’t stop me from my love | 18 | 11.8% |
| 6 | It’s hidden from them | 8 | 4.1% | It’s hidden from them | 7 | 4.6% |
| 7 | they don’t know of my love of underwear | 8 | 4.1% | they don’t know of my love of underwear | 7 | 4.6% |
| 8 | They don’t get it at all | 6 | 3.1% | Maybe | 3 | 2.0% |
Response base: 196 nonblank responses in 2024 and 152 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **No** stayed on top, moving from 37.9% in 2024 to 39.8% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 78 | 37.9% | No | 64 | 39.8% |
| 2 | Maybe | 59 | 28.6% | Maybe | 31 | 19.3% |
| 3 | Yes | 41 | 19.9% | Yes | 31 | 19.3% |
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 59 nonblank responses in 2024 and 37 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **because, money, don’t, need** in 2024 and **because, need, thongs, don’t** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | because | 6 | because | 4 |
| 2 | money | 6 | need | 4 |
| 3 | don’t | 6 | thongs | 4 |
| 4 | need | 4 | don’t | 3 |
| 5 | than | 4 | number | 3 |
| 6 | cost | 3 | money | 3 |
| 7 | fetish | 3 | problem | 3 |
| 8 | spending | 3 | probably | 2 |
| 9 | spent | 3 | expensive | 2 |
| 10 | thing | 3 | styles | 2 |
Response base: 59 nonblank responses in 2024 and 37 in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This one shifted. In 2024 the top answer was **No** at 40.3%, while in 2025 **Yes** moved into first at 46.0%. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 83 | 40.3% | Yes | 74 | 46.0% |
| 2 | Yes | 78 | 37.9% | No | 56 | 34.8% |
| 3 | Maybe | 30 | 14.6% | Maybe | 22 | 13.7% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Personal Stories – Brief Tales** led the answers, while in 2025 **Thong Shows** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Personal Stories – Brief Tales | 108 | 65.1% | Thong Shows | 83 | 68.6% |
| 2 | Thong Shows | 108 | 65.1% | Personal Stories – Brief Tales | 78 | 64.5% |
| 3 | Masculinity & Underwear | 99 | 59.6% | Sensuality – (feeling your best in undies) | 56 | 46.3% |
| 4 | Sensuality – (feeling your best in undies) | 73 | 44.0% | Sexuality | 56 | 46.3% |
| 5 | Sexuality | 71 | 42.8% | Body Image | 54 | 44.6% |
| 6 | Body Image | 64 | 38.6% | Masculinity & Underwear | 53 | 43.8% |
| 7 | Jock Shows | 45 | 27.1% | Jock Shows | 48 | 39.7% |
| 8 | Community Building | 41 | 24.7% | Community Building | 37 | 30.6% |
Response base: 166 nonblank responses in 2024 and 121 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **50+ year old men** led the answers, while in 2025 **acceptance. Actively discourage board shorts** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | 50+ year old men | 1 | 2.0% | acceptance. Actively discourage board shorts | 1 | 2.3% |
| 2 | A discovery of new brands podcast | 1 | 2.0% | Also more female perspective. Especially those who love men in sexy underwear | 1 | 2.3% |
| 3 | A local meet up podcast with guys in the same city | 1 | 2.0% | and bringing micro underwear both into the mainstream AND promote acceptance | 1 | 2.3% |
| 4 | a lot of brands are fast fashion trash that pretend to be high fashion and selling at the same price as big names | 1 | 2.0% | and encourage high street retailers to stock male thongs | 1 | 2.3% |
| 5 | advices from the brands | 1 | 2.0% | and wear them to the gym and locker room all the time | 1 | 2.3% |
| 6 | and Ethnicity | 1 | 2.0% | Any topic is great. Just not tighty white topics. | 1 | 2.3% |
| 7 | and underwear in general. Body image and underwear | 1 | 2.0% | As above | 1 | 2.3% |
| 8 | Anything on thongs | 1 | 2.0% | Asexuality | 1 | 2.3% |
Response base: 51 nonblank responses in 2024 and 43 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **$1** led the answers, while in 2025 **Maybe** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | $1 | 1 | 3.3% | Maybe | 2 | 7.1% |
| 2 | $10 | 1 | 3.3% | A discount (if possible) off of underwear from the UNB store. | 1 | 3.6% |
| 3 | $5 | 1 | 3.3% | A simple shout-out at the end | 1 | 3.6% |
| 4 | A discount on the underwear in the UNB store. | 1 | 3.3% | Already am supporting it | 1 | 3.6% |
| 5 | Ability to actually interact with a community. Patron is limited. | 1 | 3.3% | Already do 🙂 | 1 | 3.6% |
| 6 | Already a paid member | 1 | 3.3% | and sought after in an open | 1 | 3.6% |
| 7 | and perhaps a discord or other platform to help make new underwear friends and connections! | 1 | 3.3% | But I’m always fascinated by men in 70s or 80s who wore the sheer socks and sock garters as normal. So perhaps questions around things men wish would become normal again or sexy looks men tried for partners. | 1 | 3.6% |
| 8 | but am between jobs at the moment | 1 | 3.3% | but minimal styles | 1 | 3.6% |
Response base: 30 nonblank responses in 2024 and 28 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **No** stayed on top, moving from 38.8% in 2024 to 35.4% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 80 | 38.8% | No | 57 | 35.4% |
| 2 | Maybe | 53 | 25.7% | Yes | 46 | 28.6% |
| 3 | Yes | 43 | 20.9% | Maybe | 40 | 24.8% |
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Olaf Benz** led the answers, while in 2025 **Awry** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Olaf Benz | 6 | 7.1% | Awry | 3 | 5.5% |
| 2 | Hom | 4 | 4.8% | Hom | 3 | 5.5% |
| 3 | manstore | 4 | 4.8% | Aronik | 2 | 3.6% |
| 4 | Aussiebum | 3 | 3.6% | Gregg Homme | 2 | 3.6% |
| 5 | Doreanse | 3 | 3.6% | Jack Adams | 2 | 3.6% |
| 6 | Gregg Homme | 3 | 3.6% | Skull & Bones | 2 | 3.6% |
| 7 | Teamm8 | 3 | 3.6% | Sukrew | 2 | 3.6% |
| 8 | 2xist | 2 | 2.4% | 2xist | 1 | 1.8% |
Response base: 84 nonblank responses in 2024 and 55 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The same item led both years: **Andrew Christian** showed up 17 times in 2024 and 12 times in 2025. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Andrew Christian | 17 | 27.4% | Andrew Christian | 12 | 27.3% |
| 2 | Calvin Klein | 15 | 24.2% | Calvin Klein | 6 | 13.6% |
| 3 | CK | 4 | 6.5% | Aussiebum | 2 | 4.5% |
| 4 | 2xist | 2 | 3.2% | Ck | 2 | 4.5% |
| 5 | JJ malibu | 2 | 3.2% | JJ Malibu | 2 | 4.5% |
| 6 | jockey | 2 | 3.2% | n2n | 2 | 4.5% |
| 7 | Pump | 2 | 3.2% | 2xist and Cin2 | 1 | 2.3% |
| 8 | 2 xist | 1 | 1.6% | 2xst (plain Jane of underwear) | 1 | 2.3% |
Response base: 62 nonblank responses in 2024 and 44 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: multi-answer / list-style response. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The mix changed here. In 2024 **Awry** led the answers, while in 2025 **rick majors** took the top spot. Since this question behaves like a list, I counted the individual items separated by commas or line breaks so we can see what readers named most often.
| Rank | 2024 item | 2024 mentions | % of nonblank | 2025 item | 2025 mentions | % of nonblank |
| 1 | Awry | 3 | 6.2% | rick majors | 2 | 6.2% |
| 2 | King Underwear | 2 | 4.2% | A Quiet Piece | 1 | 3.1% |
| 3 | Kovarx | 2 | 4.2% | Alfons dovana makes the best thongs | 1 | 3.1% |
| 4 | 4 Hunks | 1 | 2.1% | AsWeMove – really nice to wear under spandex (no lines!) | 1 | 3.1% |
| 5 | a | 1 | 2.1% | At the moment I cannot think of any. | 1 | 3.1% |
| 6 | Alas no. | 1 | 2.1% | Awry | 1 | 3.1% |
| 7 | although it may be too late. | 1 | 2.1% | B2ld | 1 | 3.1% |
| 8 | and foreign ones (there are ones in Spain | 1 | 2.1% | BearSkin | 1 | 3.1% |
Response base: 48 nonblank responses in 2024 and 32 nonblank responses in 2025.
Column type: standard response set. This one is an exact question match across both years.
The headline here is consistency. **No** stayed on top, moving from 37.4% in 2024 to 37.3% in 2025. My take: this is a good apples-to-apples read, and it helps show whether reader habits are holding steady or starting to move.
| Rank | 2024 answer | 2024 count | % | 2025 answer | 2025 count | % |
| 1 | No | 77 | 37.4% | No | 60 | 37.3% |
| 2 | Maybe I need more info | 64 | 31.1% | Maybe I need more info | 49 | 30.4% |
| 3 | Yes – On the Blog | 12 | 5.8% | Yes, on the Podcast | 14 | 8.7% |
| 4 | Yes, on the Podcast | 11 | 5.3% | Yes – On the Blog | 11 | 6.8% |
Column type: open-ended commentary. This one is an exact question match across both years.
This was a more open-ended question, so instead of pretending it behaves like a neat poll, I treated it as reader commentary. There were 29 nonblank responses in 2024 and 17 in 2025. The recurring words leaned toward **some, people, going, email** in 2024 and **change, styles, would, thongs** in 2025.
| Rank | 2024 keyword | 2024 mentions | 2025 keyword | 2025 mentions |
| 1 | some | 4 | change | 3 |
| 2 | people | 4 | styles | 3 |
| 3 | going | 3 | would | 3 |
| 4 | 3 | thongs | 3 | |
| 5 | options | 2 | fabric | 3 |
| 6 | none | 2 | time | 2 |
| 7 | don’t | 2 | think | 2 |
| 8 | would | 2 | sheer | 2 |
| 9 | know | 2 | socks | 2 |
| 10 | give | 2 | normal | 2 |
Response base: 29 nonblank responses in 2024 and 17 in 2025.
Some sections changed format between years, so I would not call them perfect apples-to-apples comparisons without manual normalization. I am listing them here so the structure changes are clear.
The big picture is pretty clear. The UNB audience is still engaged, still buying, still exploring, and still asking for better quality, better conversation, and better spaces to be themselves. The details move around from year to year, but the heart of this audience stays the same: these guys care about underwear as style, confidence, and community, not just utility.

One brand that is often overlooked is American Jock from Go Softwear, this is a picture from 2019 featuring the leggings but they are known for some amazing singlets as well!!! Go check out the new collection

The LOCKER ROOM COLLECTION OG is back—and now it’s bringing the heat in a brand-new blue. This collection taps into that classic locker room fantasy vibe with soft cotton spandex that feels as good as it looks. Sexy, comfortable, and just the right amount of daring.
The LOCKER ROOM POCKET STRING was made for guys who want minimal coverage with maximum impact. Featuring a roomy pocket pouch for your goods and a barely-there string back that keeps everything lifted and framed perfectly, this one is tiny, smokin’ hot, and impossible to ignore.
If you love gear that makes you feel confident, sexy, and just a little rebellious, this collection delivers big time.











Lately, I’ve been obsessed with a concept I can’t stop thinking about — Bro Drag.
It’s not traditional drag. It’s not wigs and gowns and lip-sync battles. Bro Drag is something different. It’s hyper-masculinity turned into performance. Think backwards caps, gold chains, jerseys, compression shorts, competition speedos, fake swagger, and exaggerated frat energy. It’s masculinity dialed all the way up.
But here’s the twist — it’s intentional.
Bro Drag plays with straight bro culture in a way that feels ironic, erotic, and sometimes camp. It’s the performance of the “jock,” the “frat guy,” the “straight-acting” fantasy — but in queer spaces, by queer men.
While the term “Bro Drag” appears to be relatively recent (gaining visibility in the 2010s through social media, circuit culture, and themed party branding), the roots go much deeper.
In the 1970s, gay “clone culture” in places like the San Francisco Castro district and New York City featured hyper-masculine styling — mustaches, boots, tight jeans, leather. It was a political and erotic shift away from stereotypes of effeminacy.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, brands like Abercrombie & Fitch helped mainstream the frat-boy fantasy — which gay men simultaneously consumed, reinterpreted, and eroticized.
Fast forward to today, and Bro Drag exists in:
It’s masculinity as costume. It’s drag without dresses. And it raises real questions:
For a community that has long negotiated what masculinity means, Bro Drag feels like the latest evolution of that conversation.
And honestly? It connects directly to underwear culture, jock aesthetics, and the performance of confidence.
This isn’t just a look. It’s a statement. If you are a Patreon member, you can hear my podcast on this subject under the first Tim’s Take very soon.

A Dynamic New Chapter from the Swimwear 2026 Collection.
MODUS VIVENDI presents the Water Sports Swimwear Line, a bold and energetic addition to the Swimwear 2026 Collection, inspired by the power of movement, the spirit of competition, and the unmistakable intensity of summer by the sea.
Set against the vibrant atmosphere of Rio’s iconic beaches, the new Beach Volley campaign captures a world where sport, style, and sensuality naturally come together. Under the blazing sun and beside the endless ocean, the campaign celebrates the male form in motion: authentic, confident, and free.
The Water Sports Swimwear Line is designed exactly for this environment. Created for men who embrace an active lifestyle and a confident sporty aesthetic, the collection combines performance-driven functionality with the unmistakable MODUS VIVENDI attitude.
Crafted from premium polyamide fabric, each piece offers a lightweight feel and fast-drying performance, ensuring maximum comfort both in and out of the water. Athletic white stripe details create a clean and modern visual identity, emphasizing movement and enhancing the sporty silhouette.
Inspired by the natural elements and the vibrant energy of the beach, the collection introduces a striking color palette featuring bright yellows, deep ocean blues, powerful reds, and sophisticated natural earth tones. The result is swimwear that feels dynamic, fresh, and unapologetically masculine.
The line is available in low-cut classic trunks and Brazil-cut trunk styles, offering versatile options for different body types and personal styles while maintaining the collection’s strong athletic character.
Designed for the modern classic man who enjoys sports, summer freedom, and elevated beachwear, Water Sports delivers a perfect balance of functionality, comfort, and timeless sex appeal.
This is swimwear made for action and attitude. For movement, confidence, and unforgettable summer moments.
The Water Sports Swimwear Line offers lightweight comfort and fast-drying performance ideal for active beachwear and summer activities. The signature white athletic stripe details create a sporty and modern identity, while the clean-cut silhouettes enhance the male physique with confidence and simplicity.
Available in both classic low-cut trunks and Brazil-cut styles, the collection combines versatility with performance, delivering a refined athletic look suitable for both beach sports and luxury resort styling.






























& Video: Beto Urbano @beto_urbanoo
Models: Yan Nunes @yanzinhocf & Glinger Macedo @glimgerm
Discover Campaign: https://e-modusvivendi.com/watersports-line-swimwear?utm_source=press_release&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=watersports_swim_line
Discover and follow MODUS VIVENDI on the following social media
Instagram: @_modus_vivendi_
YouTube: @_modus_vivendi_
Threads: @_modus_vivendi_
TikTok: @_modus_vivendi_
Facebook: Modus.Vivendi.Underwear

Classic motoring style always stays in fashion. The new Apex Collection from Cocksox is inspired by the golden days of Monaco, Capri, and scenic coastal drives, when precision, confidence, and effortless style set the tone.
Apex isn’t just about style. It’s made for today, with a design focused on comfort, movement, and support in every pair. The Supplex fabric feels soft on your skin and helps keep you cool all day, whether you’re out and about, traveling, working out, or just want underwear that works as well as it looks.
The pouch is worth mentioning. Cocksox is known for one of the most recognizable pouch designs in men’s underwear. It’s supportive but not restrictive, giving you comfort and definition as soon as you put them on.





The collection includes all the favorite styles: briefs, trunks, bikinis, sports briefs, boxer briefs, jocks, and even long johns. It’s sleek, masculine, sporty, and has a subtle luxury feel, like something from a vintage European road trip.
If you want underwear that mixes style, performance, and comfort with a touch of retro swagger, Apex is a great choice for your drawer.
Check out the Apex Collection now at the UNB Store.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS

On this episode of the Brief Talk Podcast, UNB Tim sits down with Joey to talk about his journey into the world of thongs, Speedos, swimwear, and body confidence. What started with seeing go-go dancers at a club turned into a full love of bold swimwear, thong culture, and building confidence through self-expression.
Joey shares how he first experimented with thongs, the brands he loves, and how travel helped him become more comfortable wearing them publicly. From Punta Cana and Hawaii to Palm Springs and Hollywood Beach in Chicago, the conversation dives into the freedom and confidence that comes from finding the right gear and the right community.
The guys also discuss thong tan lines versus Speedo tan lines, favorite brands like Hunk, Grand Axis, N2N, MCE, and Glute God, and why bold prints and daring cuts make swimwear even more fun. Joey opens up about encouraging his boyfriend and even straight friends to try thongs for the first time — and how many end up loving them once they give them a chance.
There’s also a bigger conversation about community. Tim and Joey talk about the importance of creating spaces where guys can feel comfortable wearing what they love without judgment. From Thongers Weekend to future Free the Bulge travel ideas, this episode is all about confidence, friendship, and building a supportive community around self-expression.
If you’ve ever been curious about trying a thong, wearing a Speedo publicly, or just embracing more confidence in your own skin, this episode is for you.
Follow Joey on Instagram:
@joey_wright_fit
Support UNB
Patreon
www.patreon.com/unbblog
Support UNB
https://www.underwearnewsbriefs.com/about/support-unb/
UNB Store
www.unbstore.com
Amazon Wish List
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/KCJXCDDPU0LI?ref_=wl_share
Affiliate Links
Amoresy
https://amoresy.com/UNBTIM
BodyAware
https://bodyaware.com?bg_ref=7FgHF6QR1x
Xdress
https://xdress.com?bg_ref=cG6ohBdgUO
Real Men Apparel
https://www.rmac.store/TIM77812
Follow UNB
Twitter/X
@unbblog
Instagram
@unbblog
BlueSky
@unbtim
Reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/unbstoreandblog/
Website
www.underwearnewsbriefs.com
Podcast
www.brieftalkpodcast.com

Bold, provocative, and visually arresting, the Prince Albert Swimwear Line reaffirms the brand’s commitment to pushing boundaries in men’s fashion while celebrating unapologetic self-expression. The Scuba Diving Campaign captures a cinematic moment suspended between two worlds: the hidden calm of the ocean and the electric pulse of the city. Shot on rugged rocks at the water’s edge, the imagery follows a confident figure emerging from the depths, illuminated against a dramatic night skyline. Both powerful and atmospheric, the campaign thrives on contrast light versus darkness, stillness against motion.
Here, diving becomes more than an act; it transforms into a metaphor for depth, exploration, and the courage to transcend limits. It speaks to the thrill of the unknown and embodies the spirit of those who dare to go further.
At the center of this narrative is the Prince Albert Line, a daring addition to MODUS VIVENDI’s swimwear offering. Designed to challenge convention, the line features provocative silhouettes crafted from thin, shiny, quick-drying elasticated fabric that enhances the body while delivering an unmistakable fetish-inspired aesthetic. Available in both a bold thong and a low-cut bikini style, and presented in three striking colors, each piece is designed to make a statement.
Signature circular metal barbell details, placed at the side and engraved with the MODUS VIVENDI logo, draw inspiration from the iconic Prince Albert piercing, a reference steeped in history, linked to Queen Victoria’s husband, and long associated with themes of male adornment, eroticism, and power. This distinctive element elevates each design, merging heritage with contemporary sensuality.
Created for the confident, the curious, and the unapologetically bold, the Prince Albert Line is more than swimwear. It is a declaration of identity, a celebration of desire, individuality, and fearless self-expression.
With the Swimwear 2026 Collection, MODUS VIVENDI continues to redefine modern masculinity through innovative design and compelling storytelling, inviting its audience to dive deeper, both literally and metaphorically, into a world where fashion meets freedom.







Video / Photo: P2Photography @p2photographygr
Model: Dimitris Toufexis @dimitris_toufexis
Discover Campaign: https://e-modusvivendi.com/prince-albert-line-swimwear/?utm_source=press_release&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=prince_albert_swim_line
Discover and follow MODUS VIVENDI on the following social media
Instagram: @_modus_vivendi_
YouTube: @_modus_vivendi_
Threads: @_modus_vivendi_
TikTok: @_modus_vivendi_
Facebook: Modus.Vivendi.Underwear

I’ve always been kind of an underwear snob.
Not in a flashy, designer-logo way—more in the sense that I’ve never been able to do the bulk-pack, grab-whatever-is-cheap thing. If something feels off, rides up, traps heat, or just generally sucks to wear for a full day, I’m not keeping it around.
And working long shifts behind a bar definitely reinforces that. You find out pretty quickly which pairs actually hold up and which ones you regret putting on halfway through your shift.
So I’ve tried a lot of different brands over the years, always looking for that balance of comfort, fit, and something that actually lasts ( and makes me feel sexy).
Which is what eventually led me to Bluebuck—a brand that seemed to be doing things a little differently.
What Bluebuck Is (and Why It’s Different)
Bluebuck is a French brand that focuses on making clothing—especially basics—out of more natural, sustainable materials. They’re big on organic cotton and avoid synthetic fabrics like polyester and elastane whenever possible.
Which, honestly, is kind of rare.
Most underwear brands rely heavily on synthetic blends. It makes things stretchy and cheap to produce, but it also means you’re basically wrapping yourself in plastic all day. Once I realized that, I couldn’t really unthink it.
What I like about Bluebuck is that they keep things simple—natural materials, durable construction, nothing overly engineered.
There’s also this subtle nautical/workwear vibe running through the brand that I didn’t expect to care about, but ended up really liking. Deep blues, clean whites, and a kind of classic, slightly rugged feel. I always love the more classic brief print, and they have plenty to choose from. I even purchased their swim briefs and socks, which also have the same solid design and craftsmanship. Makes me want to throw on some boat shoes and hit the high seas.
They are definitely on the higher end in price, but I have noticed that all the pairs I own are still in great shape after many wash cycles. ( follow the wash/care guide!) Bundles are also available at a decent discount.
Final Verdict
I’m not ditching every other brand I own—but Bluebuck has definitely earned a spot and maybe top spot in my underwear drawer.
I look forward to trying some of their other products.
It’s one of those upgrades where you don’t realize what you were missing until you wear them for a full day and everything just… works. I’m glad I got Buck’d.

If you’ve been looking for a swim bikini that feels almost custom made for your body, the new X4D Swim Bikini from Ergowear may be one of the most innovative swimsuits on the market right now. Ergowear took everything guys love about the legendary X4D underwear line and transformed it into a sleek, minimal-seam swim design that delivers comfort, support, and an incredible fit.
The first thing you’ll notice is the construction. This isn’t your typical swim brief loaded with seams and bulky panels. The X4D Swim Bikini is crafted from a single piece of stretchy fabric with only one T-shaped seam in the front. That minimal-seam design creates a smoother fit against the body while helping reduce rubbing and chafing. The result is a swimsuit that feels lightweight, clean, and incredibly comfortable whether you’re lounging poolside, swimming laps, or spending all day at the beach.


Of course, the real star of the show is the famous X4D pouch. If you’ve worn Ergowear underwear before, you already know why guys swear by this design. The signature nose-shaped pouch creates a naturally roomy space that supports, enhances, and separates without smashing everything flat. It gives you support where you need it while still feeling relaxed and unrestricted. It’s one of the reasons Ergowear has built such a loyal following over the years.
Another detail we love is the hidden drawstring waistband. It gives you added security and support when you need it, especially for active beach days or swimming, but it also keeps the look streamlined and minimal. You can wear the drawstring visible for a sportier vibe or tuck it away for a cleaner finish.
This is the kind of swimwear Ergowear does best — combining innovation, sexy styling, and real-world comfort into one design. The X4D Swim Bikini feels modern, supportive, and confident without trying too hard. It’s minimalism done right, with a pouch designed for guys who want their swimwear to actually fit and flatter the male body.
If you’re ready to upgrade your swim drawer this season, this is definitely one pair worth checking out. Get them at the UNB Store

Lately, I’ve been thinking about what “community” really means. In our world of underwear, swimwear, spandex, and gear, it’s easy to think community is just about pictures, followers, and likes. It’s tempting to focus on who gets the most attention, but real community goes much deeper than what we see online. Gear might bring us together at first, but it shouldn’t be the only thing that keeps us connected. Real community grows through being present, showing respect, and seeing each other as whole people. It’s about making spaces where guys feel welcome and included, and remembering there’s a real person behind every profile and favorite brand.
Building a stronger community starts with being present, but that doesn’t mean you have to be the loudest person in the room. You don’t need to post hundreds of pictures a week or even show your face to take part. Being present just means engaging, like answering a question, sharing a thought, or leaving an encouraging comment. Whether you’re public or private, your participation matters because you never know when a simple “hello” could help someone feel like they finally belong.
This sense of belonging only happens when we treat each other with respect. To be honest, the gay community doesn’t always get this right. Sometimes we only include people who fit a certain “abtastic” or muscular look. But real community goes beyond appearances. It welcomes all ages, body types, and ways of expressing masculinity. Not everyone you meet has to be a potential date; some people are meant to be mentors, friends, or chosen family. When we value people for who they are, not just how they look, the whole community becomes stronger.
Every strong community needs new people, but joining can feel intimidating. There’s always someone who feels nervous about posting for the first time or wonders if they’re “fit enough” to belong. We have a responsibility to welcome newcomers, answer their questions, and show them they’re not invisible. We all started somewhere, and a friendly reply can make the difference between someone staying or leaving.
Welcoming others also means not gatekeeping. No one should have to prove they’re “gear enough” to fit in. You don’t need a huge collection or expert knowledge to join in. Curiosity should be welcomed, not made fun of. Community grows when we share what we know and gets smaller when we make people feel left out for asking simple questions. Whether you’re giving a sizing tip or recommending a brand, helping others feel informed is an easy way to make the space better for everyone.
We also need to go beyond one-on-one interactions and help connect people to each other. If you know two guys who would get along, introduce them. This turns the community from a bunch of separate friendships into a strong network. In this network, we should celebrate each other without turning it into a competition. Someone else’s success or “hotness” doesn’t take anything away from you. When we support each other’s projects, podcasts, or milestones, we build a culture of encouragement instead of rivalry.
This takes consistency, not perfection. You don’t have to be perfect or always available, but showing up with purpose builds trust over time. A big part of this is asking questions and really listening. Many guys are used to being judged by their image and aren’t used to being heard. When you ask about their lives and passions, you show you value them as people, not just for their gear.
To keep these spaces healthy, we need to make sure everyone feels safe and that boundaries are respected. Just because someone shares a photo doesn’t mean they owe anyone access to their private life. A community without boundaries can quickly become toxic, but one built on respect becomes a safe place. We have to protect the tone of our spaces by standing up against body shaming, ageism, racism, and “femme-shaming.” What we allow shapes our culture.
In the end, we need to talk about who we are as people. There’s more to us than what we wear. Gear is a fun and sexy way to express ourselves, but it’s not the whole story. Real connection happens when we’re open about our insecurities, struggles with body image, or the first time we felt confident. Supporting people beyond their “hot” moments and meeting up in real life when possible turns an online group into real support.
Community doesn’t happen overnight. It grows slowly through small, steady actions—one comment, one introduction, and one shared story at a time. Gear might bring us together at first, but friendship is the real reward. When we build with intention, we create something that lasts long after summer is over.

In this episode of the Brief Talk After Dark podcast, I’m joined by returning guest Jason and first-time guest Griff — brothers who are about to shake things up with their brand-new podcast.
And trust me… this is one you’re going to want to listen to.
What started as a simple conversation on a previous Brief Talk episode turned into something much bigger. After Jason shared stories about his relationship with his brother, listeners couldn’t get enough — and that curiosity sparked the creation of their new show.
Now, they’re taking those conversations even deeper.
We dive into:
One of the biggest takeaways?
You don’t have to be the same to understand each other — but you do have to be willing to talk.
Their conversations are raw, real, and unfolding in real time — meaning even they are learning new things about each other as they record. That honesty is what makes this podcast stand out.
And yes… we also go down memory lane with everything from International Male catalogs to early AOL chat rooms — because if you know, you KNOW.
⸻
Why This Episode Matters
This isn’t just about kink.
It’s about:
If two brothers can have these conversations… maybe more of us can too.
⸻
Check Out Their Podcast
The Kinky Bros podcast launches May 8, with multiple episodes dropping at once and new episodes weekly.
Follow and subscribe:
⸻
Final Thoughts
I’ve heard the first episode — and I’m not exaggerating when I say it’s one of the best debut podcast episodes I’ve ever listened to.
It leaves you thinking.
It leaves you wanting more.
And it opens the door to conversations we should’ve been having all along.
⸻
Support UNB
If you enjoy the Brief Talk Podcast and everything we do at Underwear News Briefs, please consider supporting us:
Patreon (join free or support monthly):
Support page (Ko-fi or PayPal):
Shop the UNB Store:
Amazon Wish List:
⸻
Listen, share, and keep the conversation going.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS

pan dolce
In this episode of the Brief Talk Podcast, UNB Tim sits down with Jesse Pellegrin, the founder of Pan Dulce Papis, a new swimwear brand designed specifically for thicker, beefier guys who want more than the same old boring black swim briefs.
The idea for the brand started at a gay pool party in Las Vegas, where Jesse noticed a familiar pattern: muscular guys had access to all the fun, colorful swimwear, while thicker men were often left with limited and uninspiring options. That moment sparked the idea to create something different — swimwear that celebrates bigger bodies with bold designs, culture, and personality.
Drawing inspiration from his Mexican heritage, Jesse created designs influenced by pan dulce (Mexican sweet bread), playful imagery, and vibrant colors that bring culture and humor into swimwear. The result is a brand that blends confidence, authenticity, and representation for guys who rarely see themselves reflected in swimwear marketing.
Jesse also shares the behind-the-scenes realities of launching a brand solo — from designing patterns and ordering prototypes to building the website and even stepping in as the model when the original shoot fell through.
What started as a fun idea has become a growing brand with new designs already on the way, including a limited Pride edition swim brief inspired by colorful Santa Monica sunsets.
Most importantly, Jesse wants his brand to help people feel comfortable in their bodies and confident wearing swim briefs — whether at a pool party, the beach, or anywhere else.
As Tim says in the episode: thick boys look amazing in Speedos — and it’s time the industry caught up.
⸻
In This Episode
• How a Vegas pool party sparked the idea for Pan Dulce Papis
• Why thicker guys are often overlooked in swimwear design
• Bringing Mexican culture into swimwear design
• The meaning behind the brand name
• Designing swimwear that is fun but still approachable
• The challenges of launching a brand solo
• Modeling your own product when the model cancels
• Why authenticity matters more than retouching photos
• Creating confidence for bigger guys wearing swim briefs
• Sneak peek at upcoming Pride swimwear designs
⸻
Key Takeaways
Representation matters
Thicker men deserve swimwear that is fun, colorful, and designed with their bodies in mind.
Culture can inspire design
Pan Dulce Papis incorporates Mexican cultural elements into swimwear in a playful and meaningful way.
Confidence grows through experience
Trying something outside your comfort zone — like wearing a swim brief — can completely change how you feel about your body.
⸻
Where to Find Pan Dulce Papis
@pan.dulce.papis
Follow the brand to see new designs, upcoming drops, and the limited Pride collection.
⸻
Final Thoughts
Pan Dulce Papis is more than just another swimwear brand. It’s about confidence, representation, and celebrating bodies that the industry often ignores.
If you’re a thicker guy who has ever thought you couldn’t pull off a swim brief — this brand might just change your mind.
And as Tim says:
You can never have too many swimsuits.
⸻
Support UNB
If you enjoy the Brief Talk Podcast and everything we do at Underwear News Briefs, please consider supporting us on Patreon.
Your support helps cover:
• Podcast hosting
• Equipment upgrades
• Website costs
• Production tools
• Growing the UNB community
You can join as a free member or support the show monthly.
Join here:
⸻
Support UNB & Our Partners
UNB Store
Support UNB
Amazon Wish List
Amoresy
BodyAware
Xdress
Real Men Apparel

Brian Widmayer — aka @thatroofcowboy — is a Florida-based fitness enthusiast, contractor, and content creator known for blending confidence, discipline, and authenticity. With a background in athletics and a passion for self-improvement, Brian uses his platform to promote body confidence, mental toughness, and breaking outdated norms around men’s fashion and self-expression.
Why You Like Briefs/Thongs
For me, it started with stepping outside my comfort zone. Most guys are taught to play it safe, but confidence doesn’t grow there. Wearing briefs and thongs became less about the clothing and more about owning who I am—physically and mentally.
It’s about being comfortable in your own skin, not seeking validation, and realizing confidence looks different on everyone. Building on that, if I can help even a few guys feel more confident and less restricted by what people think, that’s a win.
I’m big on pushing limits—whether that’s in the gym, business, or just doing something that makes most people hesitate. In my experience, growth comes from getting uncomfortable, and experimenting with briefs and thongs is just another example of that mindset.
My first time wearing a thong was when another influencer I connected with on Instagram invited me out to a Steve Aoki Tampa Hard Rock pool party. At first, I was like… why not? I saw it as an opportunity to prove to myself that I could do something uncomfortable and break out of my shell.
What to be profiled? DM us



One of the best parts of hosting the Stretching the Truth podcast is meeting people in the spandex community who really care about gear and the culture around it. Not long ago, I found someone on Spandex Party whose photos immediately stood out to me. He has incredible legs in spandex, so I reached out and invited him on the show. That’s how I got to talk with Hung in Gear, a European gear fan who truly loves Lycra. We ended up having a great conversation about how many of us first discovered spandex, why we enjoy it, and how a simple interest can turn into something much bigger.
Like a lot of people in the community, Hung in Gear first got interested in Lycra in a pretty simple way. When he was younger, his dad took up cycling, so cycling gear started showing up at home. Shiny tights and tight cycling suits were suddenly everywhere, and his curiosity soon became fascination. After he moved out, he started building his own collection. It began with secondhand finds from local shops, then he started ordering gear online and trying out different brands. Soon, a few pieces turned into drawers and boxes full of gear. Anyone who’s gotten into spandex knows how that happens.
What I really liked about our conversation was how open Hung in Gear was about how people get into spandex. Sometimes it starts because it looks good, sometimes because it feels great, or just because you like how it shows off your body. But after a while, you realize you can actually use the gear for its real purpose. Running, walking, and working out become part of the experience. What started as a fascination turns into something useful, too. As he put it, you get to wear gear you love while doing something healthy. It’s a win-win.
Another thing that stood out was how spandex culture can change depending on where you live. Hung in Gear lives in Europe and said it’s normal to see guys wearing Lycra, whether they’re cycling, running, or just wearing compression gear as part of their day. He said that on any given day, he might see fifteen or twenty guys in Lycra just living their lives. In the U.S., we’re starting to see more of that again, but Europe still seems a little ahead when it comes to making tight athletic gear a regular sight.
We also talked about favorite gear brands. Hung in Gear shared a few that anyone interested in spandex should try, like Nike compression gear, Under Armor tights, and Amoresy bodysuits. These brands offer good quality and are pretty easy to find. We both noticed that color is making a comeback. For a long time, compression gear was mostly black, navy, or dark gray, but now brighter colors like pink, yellow, orange, and light blue are showing up again. If you’re going to wear tight gear, you might as well have fun with it. Hung in Gear said he wears tights for walks and exercise, sometimes with a sweater on top. He likes making gear part of his daily life and connects with others who wear it for working out, the style, or just to feel good.
One thing Hung in Gear said really stayed with me. He explained that when someone puts on a skin-tight outfit that shows their shape, they’re celebrating their body. When you look at it like that, the color or style isn’t as important. Spandex becomes more about expressing yourself than following rules. Honestly, I think that’s something we need more of in men’s gear.
Naturally, we had to talk about wishlists. Hung in Gear said his list is long and always getting longer. He’s looking for bright pink compression sets, more Amoresy suits, and rare Nike tights he searches for on secondhand sites. He also shared a helpful tip: check secondhand sites for gear. Sometimes you find pieces you didn’t even know were out there, and they become new favorites.
What I enjoyed most about this conversation was how easy it was to relate to. Many guys discover spandex in similar ways. Curiosity turns into fascination, and a few pieces of gear slowly become a collection. Eventually, you realize it’s about more than just the gear—it’s about confidence, community, and expressing yourself. If you want to hear the full conversation with H

Bikini Club wasn’t planned. There was no strategy, no big reveal, and no detailed roadmap. It began as a throwaway line in a Sora video, where I was doing an over-the-top bro-drag fantasy—rooftop scenes, wild competition briefs, exaggerated confidence. In the midst of it, I said, “Bikini Club.” It stuck—a punchline, a phrase that captured the video’s playful energy.
But something about it stuck with me, and that changed everything.
After the video, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. I made more videos—fake Bikini Club events, Vegas day clubs, beach weekends, and guys in bright speedos walking confidently. At first, it felt like typical fantasy storytelling. But the more I worked on it, the more I wanted to experience it in real life.
Reflecting on this, I realized something that surprised me.
It wasn’t about the Speedos. It wasn’t even about the visuals. It was about the feeling underneath it all.
When I reflected on what I was creating, the core theme became clear: confidence. Men encouraging one another instead of competing, the celebration of diverse bodies, and joy without apology. At its heart, Bikini Club expresses what I wish had existed when I was younger—a supportive, visible space.
In the late ’80s and through the ’90s, wearing a swim brief wasn’t just about style for me. It made me feel vulnerable and exposed, both physically and socially. I was always aware of who might be watching and what they might be thinking. Was I okay? Was I too much or not enough? Growing up and coming out, even when being visible could still be risky, changed how I moved through the world. I learned to be cautious, to scan rooms, and to shrink myself when needed.
I used to go lie out in Piedmont Park during the week because it was quieter. Fewer people meant fewer stares, fewer variables. I wasn’t the loudest guy. I wasn’t the most confident. But when I was in a speedo in the sun, I felt closer to myself than almost anywhere else. It was one of the few places where I felt aligned in my body. That feeling mattered more than I probably understood at the time.
Confidence wasn’t something I was born with. I built it through experience and community—by finding people who made spaces feel safer and by exploring underwear and swimwear as expressions of identity. Over time, this led to UNB, the podcast, and conversations about masculinity, body image, vulnerability, and expression. At heart, my goal has always been to help men feel comfortable in their own skin.
Bringing this all together, when I started imagining Bikini Club as something real, I realized it was an extension of that same mission.
Bikini Club might look superficial, but its true purpose is empowering men to embrace themselves, normalize confidence, celebrate all body types, and foster meaningful camaraderie far beyond appearances.
What surprised me most was that the fantasy I was creating wasn’t about escaping reality; it was about aspiration. I wasn’t picturing wild parties just for show. I was imagining brotherhood without toxicity, energy without ego, and a space where men support each other rather than compare. I wanted a family built on confidence, not hierarchy.
That was the turning point: it stopped being a joke.
From that moment on, it felt like a calling.
Years of building community through UNB—writing, podcasting, sharing stories—have shown me how powerful it is when men open up. When someone says, “I thought I was the only one,” it’s transformative. Bikini Club feels like the next step—giving these conversations a real, shared space.
There will be fun events, but the heart of Bikini Club is fostering spaces where men feel seen, accepted, and supported—promoting normalcy in visibility and breaking free from limiting standards.
It’s what would happen if swim briefs were mainstream.
After I started developing Bikini Club, it felt like swim briefs were what guys wore, and if you wore something different, “what was wrong with you?” It’s Bikni Club Bro! It’s a fun alternate reality where everything we love is mainstream, and the board shorts and such are shunned. It’s like, “Are you a real man if you don’t rock the brief?” The more I develop it, the more of this concept is taking over, and we need to make it happen.
It’s about reclaiming space.
For decades, men were told to cover up, to tone it down, and to blend in. Queer men especially learned to be careful about being seen. Bigger men were told to shrink themselves, and sensitive men were told to act tougher. Bikini Club quietly stands against all of that—not with aggression or arrogance, but with confidence.
We’re here. We’re visible. We’re not apologizing.
Looking back, it’s striking that none of this began with a strategy session. Instead, it grew from a spontaneous line in a video and from recognizing how much I wanted that joy to exist in real life.
Bikini Club was meant as a fantasy. But it reflected what I cared about: confidence, family, self-expression, visibility, and freedom in your own body.
Sometimes, the things that matter most don’t come with a formal introduction. They might start as a joke, a vibe, or a creative experiment—and then they just won’t let you go.
Now, Bikini Club isn’t just an idea anymore. It’s a community I want to build.
I want to build a supportive family—a community for everyone who connects with Bikini Club’s purpose.
You’re already part of it.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS

In this special Editor’s Note episode, UNB Tim opens up about what’s been happening behind the scenes with the podcast, the blog, and life in general. From a major website hosting disaster to balancing two jobs, school, and mental health, this episode is a candid and honest look at the challenges of running an independent podcast and community.
Tim talks about why some episodes have been delayed, what’s coming next for the podcast, and how listeners can help support the show moving forward.
⸻
Topics Covered
Website Hosting Disaster
Tim shares the story of trying to move the UNB site to a new hosting provider — and how things went very wrong.
• Attempted migration to a new hosting service
• Account login issues caused by “Sign in with Apple” hiding the email
• Paying for a professional migration service
• Website suddenly going down with a 403 error
• Logging into the server to discover all site files missing
• Hours spent troubleshooting and dealing with support
• Ultimately restoring the site from a backup
Lesson learned: Always have backups of your website.
⸻
Why Podcast Episodes Have Been Delayed
Tim explains why the usual podcast schedule has been disrupted.
Current responsibilities include:
• Working two jobs
• Attending school
• Studying for cybersecurity midterms
• Managing the blog and podcast
• Handling technical issues
Because of this, episodes may not always come out on the usual schedule.
However:
• Recorded episodes will still be released
• The podcast is not going anywhere
⸻
Mental Health & Burnout
The hosting issue was the moment that pushed everything over the edge after months of stress.
Tim discusses:
• Financial pressure
• Exhaustion from balancing work, school, and content creation
• Feeling overwhelmed and burned out
He also talks about beginning the process of getting official testing for learning differences, including:
• ADHD
• Dyslexia
• Dysgraphia
Growing up, Tim often felt something was different about how he processed information but struggled to get help. Now he’s finally taking steps to better understand how his brain works and develop better coping strategies.
⸻
Studying With Dyslexia & Acronyms
Tim shares one of the biggest challenges in his cybersecurity program: acronyms.
Cybersecurity fields are filled with acronyms, which can be especially difficult for people with dyslexia.
To help study and understand the material, Tim often:
• Uses tools like ChatGPT to break down concepts
• Studies late at night after work
• Builds structured notes and binders to keep things organized
⸻
The Cost of Running the Podcast
Running the podcast costs about $175 per month, including:
• Podcast hosting
• Riverside recording software
• Canva
• Audio processing tools
• Other production services
Currently:
• Patreon brings in about $130 per month
• That leaves roughly $40 short each month
The goal is to grow Patreon support so the podcast can continue and expand.
⸻
Patreon Updates
Patreon will now include a free membership tier that acts as a newsletter.
Plans include:
• Weekly or bi-weekly updates
• Podcast announcements
• Behind-the-scenes content
• Community updates
Support tiers help cover podcast costs and allow Tim to invest more into improving the show.
⸻
Merch Ideas Wanted
Tim is also exploring new merch options and wants listener feedback.
Current merch includes:
• Podcast logo shirts
• Coffee mugs
• Mousepads
• Hats (including the popular Thong Slut hats)
Possible future ideas include:
• Minimal logo merch
• Bold statement pieces
• New hats
• Community-driven designs
Listeners are encouraged to share ideas.
⸻
Upcoming Content
Several things are coming soon:
• Bikini Club – a fun new concept launching on the blog
• A State of the Industry podcast
• Results from the last two reader surveys
• A completely redesigned community-focused reader survey
Future surveys will focus more on:
• Podcast listeners
• Community engagement
• Connecting directly with readers and listeners
⸻
Community Focus
One of Tim’s main goals this year is to connect more directly with listeners.
Ideas include:
• Voice calls with listeners
• Direct conversations with the community
• Listener-driven content
• Expanding the UNB community
If you listen regularly but haven’t connected before — reach out.
⸻
A Message to Listeners
Despite everything going on, Tim emphasizes how much he loves doing the podcast and connecting with the community.
“It brings me so much pleasure doing the podcast and talking to so many people.”
He also reminds listeners:
• You are not alone in what you love
• There are many others in the community
• Be yourself and enjoy the things that make you happy
⸻
Support UNB
If you enjoy the podcast and want to support it:
Patreon (Free or Paid Membership):
You can also support by:
• Buying merch
• Sharing the podcast
• Leaving reviews
• Reaching out and joining the community

Sorry for missing last week’s Free the Bulge. I needed a few mental health days after the migration and other personal commitments. But I’m back, and today I want to talk funding—not PBS pledge week (still not ruled out), but merch! Over the years, I’ve created several items, and only the Thong Slut hats have really taken off.
Currently, I have some shirts with the new Podcast Logos, mousepads, a coffee cup, and more available in the UNB Store under UNB Gear. I’d really like to know what merch you’re most interested in. Would you prefer subtle options you could wear daily, or are you looking for something bold? Please let me know your thoughts or specific requests.

One idea I had is enamel pins, and I have a few rough designs (examples shown above). If I did make these, there would be a preorder with a minimum needed to fulfill the order; I’ve already priced them out and could offer a presale price and a regular price. Would you be interested in enamel pins? Please comment or message me if this is something you’d purchase, and let me know which designs appeal to you, or if you have suggestions.

Similarly, my second idea is shadow boxes, because some gear is art. I have completed these two boxes. The first is a square shadow box containing an athletic cup. I love this because the Shock Doctor cup is a classic in design and stands out on the black. I have been debating putting lights on the inside as well, but that’s for phase two. The second is a Jockstrap in a shadow box. I chose the jock just for the classic jock icon status, but it can also include white briefs, bikinis, Speedos, thongs, and more. These two can have lights inside as well. These would not be cheap. So far, I estimate about $75 for the cup (due to the deep shadowbox needed) and about $60 for the underwear. I could put in a favorite pair or a new pair. But if I did a used pair, it would have to be freshly laundered and sent. The prices for shadow boxes are not bad for custom work. I’m looking at different backgrounds depending on the pair (such as complementary colors to make it pop), but these are both off the shelf, and I wanted to make sure I could make them happen before I invest too much in them. If you wanted a custom pair, I could either order it and put it in the box, or the customer would have to send it to me. I believe I could do singlets or spandex shorts as well. But that Price would be around $125 or more, and shipping would be interesting. (Note the swimwear didn’t turn out well, the shadow box was too small and I couldn’t stretch it as much as I needed, Also, it was a small and still too big for 11×17, going to try with a 16×20 with another pair and try again, but the cup turned out amazing)
What do you think of these ideas? Do you have your own ideas for underwear or gear merch you’d like to see? Please share your suggestions or feedback with me—I’d love to work on prototypes or designs that you actually want. Your input matters!

Get ready for the latest from N2N Bodywear: the Liquid Metal Collection. This new release brings real shine and attitude with the Liquid Metal Pocket String, a style that’s bold, sleek, and sure to stand out.
The fabric hugs your body with a shimmering finish that catches the light and highlights every curve. The adjustable pouch lets you find the perfect fit, while the slim waist and booty bands keep the look sharp and daring. This is bold, sexy loungewear that pushes boundaries, something N2N does best.
If you want something that feels as good as it looks and grabs attention right away, the Liquid Metal Pocket String is for you.




Details
N2N sets a new standard with a design that blends comfort, shine, and real confidence.

MODUS VIVENDI presents “DOZE OFF” campaign & MV PILL SWIMWEAR LINE – SWIMWEAR 2026 COLLECTION
MODUS VIVENDI unveils Doze Off, the striking new campaign for its Swimwear 2026 Collection. A concept that merges fantasy, fashion, and attitude into a visually captivating and unapologetically bold narrative. Designed to challenge perceptions and celebrate individuality, the campaign invites audiences to step into a dreamlike state where confidence takes over and self-expression knows no limits.
Doze Off is your new favorite prescription: zero dosage limits maximum side effects. Somewhere between a pharmacy visit and a full-blown daydream, this capsule-covered swimwear transforms “taking it easy” into a powerful statement. Set in a surreal environment where reality softens and imagination sharpens, the campaign plays with contrasts.
In this world, slowing down does not mean fading out. Quite the opposite. Expect sudden confidence. Expect people staring longer than medically recommended. Expect presence. This summer, the only thing you are overdosing on is attention. So go ahead, skip reality and just doze off.
Serving as the visual and conceptual core of the campaign, the MV Pill Swimwear Line delivers a daring exploration of color, print, and personality. At its essence lies a fully customized MODUS VIVENDI all-over print. A vivid arrangement of multicolored pills that creates an instantly recognizable and disruptive aesthetic. The design blances playfulness with provocation, forming a bold visual language that commands attention from every angle.
Beyond its visual impact, the line is engineered with performance and comfort in mind. Each piece is crafted from premium quick-drying, elasticated fabric that enhances the vibrancy of the print while ensuring durability and long-lasting shape retention. The material supports movement, adapts to the body, and delivers a fast-drying experience, making it as functional as it is expressive.
The MV Pill Swimwear Line offers a diverse range of silhouettes to suit different styles and preferences. From low-rise bikini cuts that emphasize sensuality, to timeless athletic swim briefs that combine comfort with sharp aesthetics, and athletic short-style swimsuits that introduce versatility with a contemporary edge — the collection is designed to empower wearers across all moods and moments.
This swimwear that does not just complement the body. It amplifies personality. Playful yet powerful, provocative yet wearable, the MV Pill line speaks to those who embrace color with confidence and are not afraid to be seen.
With Doze Off, MODUS VIVENDI once again pushes creative boundaries, transforming swimwear into a statement of identity, attitude, and fearless self-expression.










Video / Photo: P2Photography @p2photographygr
Model: Dimitris Toufexis @dimitris_toufexis
Discover Campaign: https://e-modusvivendi.com/mv-pill-line-swimwear?utm_source=press_release&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mv_pill_swim_line
For more information, images, or to request samples, please contact: marketing@e-modusvivendi.com or sales@e-modusvivendi.com
Discover and follow MODUS VIVENDI on the following social media
Instagram: @_modus_vivendi_
YouTube: @_modus_vivendi_
Threads: @_modus_vivendi_
TikTok: @_modus_vivendi_
Facebook: Modus.Vivendi.Underwear

MODUS VIVENDI unveils its Spring/Summer 2026 collection with the launch of the Air Bubble Line, accompanied by the evocative “Side A / Side B” campaign. A visual and conceptual exploration of duality, identity, and self-expression.
At the heart of the campaign lies a powerful narrative:
Side A / Side B explores the duality within, where softness meets intensity, and control gives way to instinct. Set between two contrasting worlds, a warm, intimate space and a darker, charged environment, the campaign reveals the many expressions of one body: romantic and refined on one side, bold and unapologetically raw on the other. Defined by texture, the Air Bubble line becomes a second skin that moves between these states, embracing the idea that identity is never singular. It shifts, evolves, and exists in both.
This duality is brought to life through the Air Bubble Line, a bold and innovative range of men’s underwear and fashion tops that merges tactile design with elevated comfort. Crafted from ultra-smooth, velvet-touch fabric, the collection introduces a distinctive all-over print inspired by air bubble wrap—transforming a familiar texture into a striking visual statement.
Designed with both aesthetics and performance in mind, the line includes thongs, briefs, and boxers featuring sleek, contemporary silhouettes that enhance the male form while allowing full freedom of movement. The fabric’s butter-soft elasticity ensures a second-skin feel, delivering lightweight breathability and all-day comfort.
Available in deep charcoal and dusty pink, the Air Bubble Line extends beyond underwear to include a coordinated muscle shirt and sleeveless top, offering a complete, fashion-forward wardrobe proposition. Each piece reflects MODUS VIVENDI’s commitment to pushing boundaries—blending creativity, sensuality, and modern design into everyday wear. With the Air Bubble Line, MODUS VIVENDI continues to redefine men’s fashion, inviting wearers to embrace every side of themselves. Where innovative fashion meets everyday wearability.









Discover and follow MODUS VIVENDI on the following social media
Instagram: @_modus_vivendi_
YouTube: @_modus_vivendi_
Threads: @_modus_vivendi_
TikTok: @_modus_vivendi_
Facebook: Modus.Vivendi.Underwear

Hey guys, I wanted to go through a little bit of what happened this week, and I am still pissed at this experience. It’s one of those things that from the beginning, your inner voice says, ” Don’t do this, but you don’t listen. This is the second time I have tried to migrate UNB/Brief Talk to a new, cheaper server, and it’s turned out worse than when I started.
A little backstory: I was trying to cut costs and make things easier for me in the long run. I have been with my current host for 15 years, and they are getting expensive, more so than other hosting companies out there. When I tried to migrate before, it was a nightmare, but now it seems much easier.
Things sent alarm bells from the beginning.
A thing about me, when I get super pissed, I get quiet and calm. I listen, and when I respond, I want answers to my questions. I am not asking frivolous questions; these are things I need to know. And when you dance around them, don’t answer them, or deflect, that is not good. Because UNB has been a part of my life for almost 18 years. It’s a very big part of me, and when I found the site was completely gone, I feared it might not be recovered. I was going to walk away. Had the site not been able to be restored from my backup, there would be no more UNB, Brief talk, or anything. It was devastating to me. And to have the person on the other end of the phone not give a fuck, made it worse to me. It felt like a malicious act, not a big deal. And when I say I was done, I was 100% done. This year has been extremely rough, and to have the one big positive thing in my life gone was devastating. The next step is, I don’t know. I’m sticking with the higher-priced hosting.